MAHINDRA PIK-UP 2009
4x4 dual cab
| Crash Test | Score | Maximum Score |
|---|
| Overall Score | 16.49 | out of 37 |
| Frontal Offset test | 2.39 | out of 16 |
| Side impact test | 16 | out of 16 |
| Pole test (Optional) | 0 | out of 2 |
| Bonus points | 0 | out of 3 |
High risk of life-threatening head & neck injury in offset test.
The Mahindra Pik-Up was introduced in Australia during 2007. This ANCAP rating applies to 4x4 Dual Cab Pik-Ups built from July 2009, when several production changes were introduced for Australasia.
The Mahindra Pik Up scored 2.39 out of 16 in the offset crash test. The passenger compartment lost structural integrity. There was a high risk of serious head, leg and foot injury for the driver.
The vehicle was awarded a default score of 16 out of 16 in the side impact crash test.
Safety Feature Summary
The safety feature information below is subject to change without notice. For up to date safety feature specifications for all variants, please see the safety feature table to the right or contact the manufacturer.
Dual front airbags and antilock brakes (ABS), are standard. Electronic stability control (ESC) is not available.
Pretensioners are fitted to the front seat belts to reduce slack in the event of a crash. There are no top tether anchorages for child restraints so this vehicle is unsuitable for transporting children under the age of four.
ANCAP & UCSR Rating ExplainedThis shows the differences between the rating processes.
Find out more
Frontal Offset Crash Test Results
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Frontal Offset*
|
2.39
|
pts
|
(out of
16)
|
|
Head/Neck
|
0
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
1
|
pts
|
|
|
Upper Legs
|
1.39
|
pts
|
|
|
Lower Legs
|
0
|
pts
|
|
The passenger compartment lost structural integrity in the offset crash test. The throttle pedal moved rearwards by 298mm and upwards 137mm. The steering wheel hub moved 62mm rearward, 104mm upward and 18mm sideways. The front ("A") pillar moved 104mm rearwards. All doors remained latched during the crash. After the crash the driver’s door could be opened with high manual effort. The tailshaft moved sideways and dented the fuel tank.
The airbag was still deploying when the driver's head contacted it. This increased the risk of serious head and neck injury. Steering column and dash components were a potential source of injury for the driver's knees. The passenger's head was cushioned by the airbag. Dash components were also a potential source of injury for the passenger's knees.
Side Impact Test Results
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Side Impact*
|
16
|
pts
|
(out of
16)
|
|
Head
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Abdomen
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Pelvis
|
4
|
pts
|
|
The side impact test normally used by ANCAP simulates a small car striking the driver's door of the vehicle under test. It is based on a regulation test but the regulation does not apply to vehicles with a high seat height like the Pik-up. Experience shows that such vehicles can be expected to perform well in this test so ANCAP has decided to award full score for these vehicles instead of conducting a crash test.
Marginal
Pedestrian Summary
This rating is based on tests to a previous protocol. Scores might vary under the latest test protocol.
Pedestrian Rating Explained
The Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) provides consumers with independent and transparent information on the level of occupant and pedestrian protection provided by different new car models, in the most common types of crashes, through its star rating program.
Find out more
Green Vehicle Guide
|
Combined Fuel Consumption
|
CO2
|
Greenhouse Rating
|
Air Pollution Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
9.9 L/100km
|
260 g/km
|
5 /10
|
3 /10
|
|
Base Model Safety Features
Legend
Standard
Not Available
Optional
No Information
The latest UCSR are based on statistics collected from car crashes in Australia and New Zealand between 1990 and 2017, where someone was killed or seriously injured. Over eight million police reported crashes were analysed in the latest UCSR.
