MERCEDES-BENZ ML320 CDI 2008
Driver Protection rating based on analysis of real world crashes.
Used Car Safety Report
The Mercedes-Benz ML320 CDI has been awarded a 5 star Driver Protection rating in the latest Used Car Safety Rating (UCSR) report. UCSR are reported annually by the Monash University Accident Research Centre (MUARC). Ratings are estimated from data on real crashes reported to police in Australia and New Zealand and provide a very high level of confidence. The UCSR report classifies cars according to where their rating lies in relation to a best performance benchmark. The Driver Protection rating measures the relative safety of cars in preventing serious injury to their own drivers in crashes.
Driver Protection Rating
|
Rating
|
Result
|
|
Excellent
|
|
Good
|
|
Marginal
|
|
Poor
|
|
Very Poor
|
For further information on the UCSR please click here.
If you would like to view the new car safety rating produced by ANCAP please see the archived report below:
| Crash Test | Score | Maximum Score |
|---|
| Overall Score | 33.97 | out of 37 |
| Frontal Offset test | 13.97 | out of 16 |
| Side impact test | 16 | out of 16 |
| Pole test (Optional) | 2 | out of 2 |
| Bonus points | 2 | out of 3 |
Data suplied by euroNCAP
The tested model of M-Class was introduced in Australia during 2008. Knee airbags, as fitted to the tested vehicle, are standard for the 2009 Model Year (supplied in Australia from September 2008).
The M-Class scored 13.97 out of 16 in the offset crash test. The passenger compartment held its shape very well. There was a slight risk of serious chest and leg injury for both the driver and passenger.
The vehicle scored 16 out of 16 in the side impact crash test and a further two points in the optional pole test.
Important note: The diesel left-hand-drive European model was tested by Euro NCAP. Australasian specifications may vary and therefore models sold in Australasia might provide different levels of protection to those described on this page.
Safety Feature Summary
The safety feature information below is subject to change without notice. For up to date safety feature specifications for all variants, please see the safety feature table to the right or contact the manufacturer.
Dual front airbags, side airbags and head-protecting side curtains are standard equipment. Antilock brakes (ABS), electronic brake distribution (EBD) and electronic stability control (ESC) are also standard. Intelligent seat belt reminders are fitted to both front seats. PRE-SAFE is standard but was disengaged for the crash tests. The front seat belt buckles are mounted on the seats and the upper anchorages are adjustable. These features improve the fit of the seat belt.
Pretensioners are fitted to the front seat belts to reduce slack in the event of a crash. A three point seat belt is fitted to the centre rear seat. This provides better protection than a two point (lap) seat belt.
ANCAP & UCSR Rating ExplainedThis shows the differences between the rating processes.
Find out more
Frontal Offset Test Results
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Frontal Offset*
|
13.97
|
pts
|
(out of
16)
|
|
Head/Neck
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
2.99
|
pts
|
|
|
Upper Legs
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Lower Legs
|
2.98
|
pts
|
|
The passenger compartment held its shape well in the offset crash test. The brake pedal moved rearwards by 57mm. The steering wheel hub moved 71mm forrward, 31mm downward and 4mm sideways. The front ("A") pillar moved 22mm rearwards. All doors remained closed during the crash. After the crash all doors could be opened with normal effort.
The airbag cushioned the head of the driver and contact was stable. There were no knee hazards. The passenger's head was cushioned by the airbag.
Side Impact Test Results
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Side Impact*
|
16
|
pts
|
(out of
16)
|
|
Head
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Abdomen
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Pelvis
|
4
|
pts
|
|
The vehicle was eligible for an optional pole impact test, since it had head-protecting side airbags and scored four points for the head in the side impact test. The manufacturer decided to go ahead with the pole test and the vehicle earned a further two points.
Pedestrian Summary
A separate pedestrian impact test is conducted. This test estimates injuries to pedestrians struck by a vehicle travelling at 40 km/h. The more stars the better (maximum 4 stars).
The bumper and bonnet leading edge offered only poor leg protection. The bonnet top was also rated as predominantly poor for the protection offered to a child's head.
Pedestrian Rating Explained
The Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) provides consumers with independent and transparent information on the level of occupant and pedestrian protection provided by different new car models, in the most common types of crashes, through its star rating program.
Find out more
Green Vehicle Guide
|
Combined Fuel Consumption
|
CO2
|
Greenhouse Rating
|
Air Pollution Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
9.8 L/100km
|
260 g/km
|
5 /10
|
3 /10
|
|
Base Model Safety Features
Legend
Standard
Not Available
Optional
No Information
Australasia’s independent authority on vehicle safety, ANCAP, has announced a 3 star safety rating for the all new Suzuki Jimny – falling shy of expected safety standards in three of the four areas of assessment.
